Republicans want to fight climate change, too
PhD, Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University
M.A, Conflict Transformation & Peacebuilding, Eastern Mennonite University
This year is quickly shaping up to be a banner year for action on climate change. And just in time. Last year was the hottest year on record. We also logged the highest global carbon emissions ever. This resulted in a slew of extreme weather events, such as California’s drought, the region's worst in 1,200 years.
In response, from China to Chattanooga, there is new activity on the climate front. Private sector leaders are recognizing the financial risks of global warming. Elected officials are protecting constituents from the fallout, including agricultural crop losses, security threats, infrastructure damage, and other economic costs.
Crucially, the U.S. Congress could surprise many by taking action on climate change. While many doubt that a GOP-controlled Congress will do much on the issue, the truth is that a climate-friendly Congress may emerge from the partisan fray. Here’s how.
There is growing bipartisanship on this issue. After all, preserving and conserving the environment is a conservative value as well as a liberal one. In fact, new data from the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication shows that the majority of Republicans, like most Americans, recognize the threat of climate change. Only a minority are in denial. Further, a majority of Republicans support regulating CO2 as a pollutant, as well as tax rebates for energy efficient vehicles and solar panel purchases.
It’s worth remembering the days when Newt Gingrich and Nancy Pelosi joined forces to take on climate change. This wasn’t so long ago! Nor was the time when Republican conservatives, such as Rep. Roscoe Bartlett of Maryland, weighed in on the importance of Earth Day and the findings of the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Fast-forward to today’s 114th Congress. Republicans are leveraging conservative concepts to promote environmental conservation.
The leadership shown by New York Rep. Chris Gibson (whose district was recently hit by the worst floods in 500 years) and Louisiana Rep. Garrett Graves (whose district may one day be under water) is just one example of the Republican potential. Even New Jersey Rep. Chris Smith has pointed out, "Climate change is a global challenge that must be addressed with a global solution."
It’s important to understand that conservative action on this front isn’t always categorized under the traditional rubric of climate change. For example, Reps. Tom Cole (Okla.), Charles Dent (Pa.), Don Young (Alaska), and Michael Fitzpatrick (Pa.) all co-sponsored Democratic Rep. Matt Cartwright’s (Pa.) Preparedness and Risk Management for Extreme Weather Patterns Assuring Resilience (PREPARE) Act, legislation that helps the federal government plan and prepare for the risks associated with extreme weather incidents.
These House Republicans know full well the connection between extreme weather and climate change and are keen to do something about it. They’re not alone. Consider Republican Rep. David Joyce’s (Ohio) continued effort to protect the Great Lakes, authorizing $300 million each year for the next five years for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. Joyceunderstands fragile ecosystems and habitats and the importance of protecting existing fresh water supplies — all of which will be imperiled by a warming climate.
The chances for Senate bipartisanship are also promising. Republican Sen. Susan Collins (Maine) and Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy (Conn.) have led on a bipartisan bill to reduce emissions from short-lived climate pollutants, known as super pollutants, which account for 40 percent of global warming. This is a big deal and would make a big dent in greenhouse gas emissions.
Meanwhile, Republican Sen. Rob Portman (Ohio) is helping lead a bipartisan effort with Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.) to improve energy efficiency across America — an effort Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) is also supporting. This, too, would substantially reduce America’s emissions footprint.
All of these early steps offer solid foundations for Congress to move forward on climate legislation. The key to ensuring that any action is politically palatable is to focus on more urgent priorities — responding to disasters, tracking storms, cutting energy costs.
Climate change is increasingly being felt in the here and now, and the majority of the American people want their elected officials to do something about it — regardless of party.
This material is presented as the original analysis of analysts at S-CAR and is distributed without profit and for educational purposes. Attribution to the copyright holder is provided whenever available as is a link to the original source. Reproduction of copyrighted material is subject to the requirements of the copyright owner. Visit the original source of this material to determine restrictions before reproducing it. To request the alteration or removal of this material please email [email protected].
rosters
IMPORTANT LINKS
- Home
- Admissions
- Academics
- Research & Practice
- Center for Peacemaking Practice
- Center for the Study of Gender and Conflict
- Center for the Study of Narrative and Conflict Resolution
- Center for World Religions, Diplomacy, and Conflict Resolution
- Indonesia - U.S. Youth Leadership Program
- Dialogue and Difference
- Insight Conflict Resolution Program
- Parents of the Field Project
- Program on History, Memory, and Conflict
- Project on Contentious Politics
- Sudan Task Group
- Undergraduate Experiential Learning Project
- Zones of Peace Survey
- News & Events
- Student and Career Services
- Alumni
- Giving